PART TWO
[PART
Extremely
Low Frequency (ELF) or Power line (60 Hz)
Electric and Magnetic Fields (EMFs) – known as “ELF EMFs”
World-renowned
scientists disagree with electric power utilities and anyone else who says that
we are safe in our homes, schools, places of work, communities, etc. from
radiation! On the contrary, they say that most of the twentieth century
diseases of civilization, including cancers, birth defects, depression,
learning disabilities, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Alzheimer’s Disease, and
Sudden Infant Death Syndrome as well as cardiovascular disease, diabetes and
suicide parallel the growth of residential electrification. Dr.
Sam Milham, MD,
Health Canada is – and has been for decades – deeply imbedded with the four Western-aligned
radiation ‘Regulatory Agencies’: the World Health Organization (WHO), the
International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), the
International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES) – which is a committee
of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) - and the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC). All five agencies are responsible for
establishing what are supposed to be ‘safe’ Exposure Limits or ‘Guidelines’ to
protect the public from both radio frequency (RF) and extremely low
frequency (ELF, i.e. 60 Hz) electric and magnetic fields
(EMFs).
With
respect to ELF radiation, invisible electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) exist,
separately, in anything in which alternating current (A/C) electrical current
flows, e.g., high voltage transmission and residential distribution lines,
substations, step-down transformers, ‘Smart’ Meters, ‘Smart’ appliances,
household 60 Hz electricity, electrical appliances, tools, machinery, electronics,
motorized vehicles, etc.
Electric power
utilities are the cornerstone of any industrialized economy. In 2014,
Proof
That We Are Being Harmed!
Explanation. The ‘strength’ of any ELF magnetic field (explained above) in our
homes, places of work, etc. is measured in what are called “milliGauss” (mG),
meaning thousands of a Gauss (‘Gauss’ being the scientist’s name credited with
discovering magnetic fields). The smaller the number of mG, the safer it is for
people; the larger the number, the more likely people will experience some
illness, e.g., leukemia, cancer, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s,
Non-Industry
Scientists Say
0.1 mG is the desired level for
homes, schools and the workplace!
<0.2 mG is the maximum level he
recommended for schools!
<1 mG is the maximum level he
considered ‘safe’ for the general public!
<1 mG is considered by scientists
to be a ‘safe’ level for homes by scientists.
>3 mG is known to be associated with leukemia in
children
<3 mG is the current US Industry standard. [6]
Health
2,000 mG
(for the public) and 10,000 mG
(occupational) --------- says ICNIRP
[7]
2,000 mG (for the public) and 10,000 mG (occupational) --------- says
the WHO
(even though, in 2002,
its own International Agency
For Research on Cancer (
magnetic fields a Class 2B
(“Possible”) carcinogen!) [8]
2,000 mG (for the public) and 10,000 mG (occupational) -----------says
the
9,040 mG
(for the public) ----------------------------------------------------says the IEEE [9]
No ceiling required
-------------------------------------------------says USA Federal Gov’t [10]
No ceiling required
-------------------------------------------------says Health
(Note: The revised SC6 (2015) still
applies only to frequencies above 3 kHz! [12]
Non-Industry
Scientists Have Long Known That:
·
ELF
(60 Hz) magnetic fields:
Ø Reduce the production of melatonin in humans
and animals. [13] [14] [15] [16]
Ø Greatly
enhance the growth of cancer cells! [17 [18] [19] [20] [21]
Ø Inhibit the effectiveness of Tamoxifen in the
treatment of cancers [22] [23]
·
Alzheimer’s disease is linked
to reduced melatonin production in the
elderly [24]
·
Night
shift workers have about a 50% increased risk of breast cancer! [25]
·
Childhood acute lymphoblastic
leukaemia is attributable to residential electrification, 75% of which, and 60
% of all childhood leukaemia, may be preventable." [26]
·
In 2007, the International
Agency for Research on Cancer (
·
There
are over 70 studies showing that
·
Overhead high
voltage lines can easily lower property values 15% to 25% and even up to 90%! [30]
·
In Nov. 2015,
the largest epidemiological study of its kind concluded that power frequency
(60 Hz) magnetic fields “can promote cancer!” [31]
·
Since May,
2015, at least 220 scientists from 42 countries have signed the “International EMF Scientists Appeal”
calling on the United Nations, all UN-member nations and the WHO to: “Protect
mankind, animals and plant life from EMFs generated by electric and wireless
devices.” They stressed the need to protect children and pregnant women! [32]
·
In 2015, the
Government of France banned the use of Wi-Fi in kindergartens across the country;
urged Wi-Fi in all schools to be turned off when not actually in use, and
adopted other measures to protect the public more. [33]
·
On
·
In 2014, the
US Dept. of the Interior said that FCC’s guidelines are out of date as their
·
In 2014, other
distinguished scientists have said that ELF EMFs also cause, promote or are
linked to adult leukaemia, adult brain tumours,
·
In 2011, the
Council of Europe (47 countries, 800-million people) urged all its members to
‘reconsider’ ICNIRP’s Exposure Limits as they have serious limitations and,
instead, apply “As Low As Reasonably Achievable” or ALARA! (Note: ICNIRP’s
limits are similar to those of HC, the WHO, IEEE and FCC!) [37]
·
In 2011, Dr.
Magda Havas, Ph.D., one of Canada’s most internationally-respected authorities on
Radio Frequency (RF) and ELF EMFs, has stated: “Regulators, government
agencies, utilities, manufacturers, architects and builders, health
authorities, hospitals and medical centers, parents, school boards and the
media need to take proactive action now to protect human health from excessive
exposures to EMFs.” (See the list of 16 International Resolutions and Appeals
calling for lower (safer) levels of electric and magnetic fields. [38] [39]
·
In 2008 - Many leading
scientists have called the whole mass irradiation of human populations the
largest involuntary biological experiment ever on the human race and the one
most likely to endanger its future. [40]
·
In 2007,
·
In 2005, five rooms in the Israeli
Prime Minister’s Office had to be vacated due to high EMFs: 20-30 mG! Which is
10 times higher than allowable limits! [42]
·
In 2005, the UK Government’s Health Protection
Agency-Radiation Protection (HPA
·
In 2005, Finnish EMF doctors urged the European Parliament to
act promptly for the adoption of new EMF standards to protect members of the
EU. Physicians and researchers want the standards recommended by ICNIRP to be
abandoned because recent studies show they are too high! (This referred specifically
to RF not ELF) [44]
·
In 2002, the WHO’s
·
In 2002,
world-famous scientist Dr. Neil Cherry’s (1946 – 2003) recommended the
following maximum magnetic field for 50/60 Hz environments: Not more than 1 mG
for the general public; not more than 0.2 mG for the school environment.
Desirable levels in homes, schools and workplaces should be 0.1 mG. [46]
·
In 2001, the same
Dr. Neil Cherry explained that ELF EMFs: “…. whose frequencies, harmonics and sub-harmonics
coincide with the range of frequencies used by our brains, hearts and cells.
Subtly and at extremely low intensities, they strongly interact, through
resonant absorption, with primary functions of our bodies with significant
elevations in depression, sickness and death.” He also said: “We need absolute
proof positive of the harmful effects of EM radiation on living systems. We
have it! The key is that the effects of radiation are CUMULATIVE – I repeat
CUMULATIVE! It can take 10 – 20 – 30 or even more years for the damage to
become apparent. It can even be handed down through generations. These things
we know.” [47]
·
In 2001, 21 scientists from 10 countries
unanimously find that ELF electric and magnetic fields are a Class 2B
(“Possible”) carcinogen! (
·
In 2001, a new and innovative
·
In 2000,
two-time Nobel Prize in Medicine nominee Robert O. Becker, M. D., author of
both “Cross Currents” and “The Body Electric” said: “I have no doubt that at
the present time the greatest polluting element in the earth’s environment is
the proliferation of electromagnetic fields.” [50]
·
In
2000, Dr. Robert O. Becker, M.D. also said: “….scientific evidence is
absolutely conclusive that 50-60 Hz magnetic fields cause human cancer cells to
permanently increase their rate of growth by as much as 1600% and to develop more malignant
characteristics!” [also 50]
·
In 2000, the
·
In
1998, the US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
classified ELF EMF a “Possible
Carcinogen,” based on 100 epidemiological studies that showed an association between residential and occupational EMF
exposure and many types of cancer. The association between EMF exposure and
childhood cancer is especially strong. [52]
·
In 1998, Professor William Leiss
of the
·
In 1997, the
New Zealand Herald reported that
·
A 1996 study
of cancers in 30,000 hydro workers by the
[57]
·
In 1995, the American Journal of Epidemiology reported that
utility workers have a greater chance of dying of brain cancer. The results
demonstrated that workers with the highest EMF exposures had more than a
two-and-a-half times greater chance of dying of brain cancer than the least
exposed workers. [59] [60]
·
In 1994, the Swedish government
made public the results of a 25 year study (1960-1985) of ELF EMFs saying: "We suspect magnetic fields may pose
certain risks to health, but we cannot be certain ….. It recommended against
locating new homes and schools near existing electricity generating plants and
proposes that high magnetic fields in homes, schools, and workplaces be
limited. It also said electric fields from overhead power lines generate
cancer in children 4 times normal rate and 3 times normal rate in adults. [61] [62]
·
In 1994, a
·
In 1993,
further Nordic studies were published and a combined analysis supported the
link between ELF magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia at field levels above
2 mG to 3 mG! Other studies indicate
other illnesses e.g. headaches, depression, suicide, myalgias, asthenias,
leucocyte count disturbance leading to impaired immune response, etc. [65]
·
A 1992 Danish
study conducted by Dr. Jorgen H. Olsen found a five-fold increase in the risk
of childhood leukemia, lymphomas and brain tumours where children living near
power lines were exposed to 4 mG. [66]
·
In 1990, the American Journal of Epidemiology
published a study on electric blankets which demonstrated a quadrupling of
brain tumors among children whose mothers slept under electric blankets during
the first trimester of pregnancy! [67]
·
In 1990, the U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
stated in a draft report: “Power line EMFs should be classified a Probable
carcinogen!” The recommendation, which could have set off a costly chain
of regulatory actions, was deleted from the final draft after review by the
White House Office of Policy Development.” [68]
[69]
·
In 1990, a
director of the EPA said in a Fortune magazine article: “In all my years of
looking at chemicals, I have never seen a set of epidemiological studies that
remotely approached the weight of evidence that we’re seeing with ELF EMFs.
Clearly there is something here!” [70]
·
In 1989, a
Johns Hopkins University report showed that male telephone cable splicers have
a higher than average risk of leukemia and lymphoma, as well as lung, prostate,
colon, and even breast cancer. [71]
·
In 1989, Dr.
John Dennis, while Assistant Director of the UK’s National Radiation Protection
Bureau issued a statement which, in part, said: "…. if the link is real
then EM fields may be responsible for up to 15% of all childhood cancers, but
as childhood cancer is a comparatively rare disease the increased risks, if
real, are within the levels generally regarded as acceptable." [72]
·
In
1988, studies of hydro-electric company workers showed that those exposed to
60-Hz fields had an incidence of brain tumors 13 times greater than that in a
comparable unexposed group! [73]
·
In 1988 – Cancer studies of workers - Compelling Evidence! A study by
Preston-Martin and Peters found that electric welders developed leukemia 25 times
more often than non-welders. [74]
·
In 1987, the New York State Power Line Project report said possibly 10 to
15% of all childhood cancer cases in the
·
In 1986,
Swedish Dr Lennart Tomenius published his report on ELF EMFs which found that
for magnetic fields over 3 mG the chance of getting cancer was more than
doubled. For brain tumours the increase was almost four-fold! [also 75]
·
In 1985, a
25-year Swedish study of 500,000 people living within 300 meters of high
voltage lines found that children under 15 were 2.7 times more likely to
contract leukemia when exposed to magnetic fields greater than 2 mG, and 3.8
times when exposed to 3 mG! [76]
·
Since at
least 1979 scientists have known that EMFs damage
·
In 1979, the
first scientist to study and document the harmful effects of ELF magnetic
fields on children, epidemiologist, Dr. Nancy Wertheimer, assisted by
physicist, Ed Leeper, found that it causes, promotes or is linked to leukemia)
[78]
·
In or about 1979, Paul Demers, working
with Dr. David Thomas’s research group at the Hutchinson center, found that telephone
linemen, electricians and electric power workers have six times the expected
rate of male breast cancer – a statistically significant increase. For radio
and communications workers, the risk was almost tripled. Overall there was a
doubling of the cancer risk for all EMF-exposed workers. [79]
·
Since at least 1972, Soviet studies showed harmful effects to
workers’ central nervous system,
the heart and circulatory system. [80] [81]
The Politics of EMF - Corruption and Suppression of the Truth
By
the mid-1960s, the US power industry had obtained copies of Soviet studies on
the biological effects of non-ionizing radiation from ELF EMFs, but technologically-ignorant,
gullible, naïve and/or corrupt governments, aided by a sinfully silent news
media, have been duped by industry to suppress the truth in order to avoid
crippling class-action law suits and prohibitive re-engineering and
construction costs to rectify the situation – both of which are inevitable! [82]
[83]
Industrialized societies depend on electrification, and electric utilities
constitute the cornerstone of any modern economy, provincial or national. Tragically
for democracy, in most jurisdictions electric power utilities enjoy no
competition. Consequently, they are able to exert undue influence on non-technical
politicians running revenue-hungry governments. It is regrettable but
understandable that Nicola Tesla, the inventor of alternating current (A/C), did
not foresee that A/C electricity brought with it EMFs which scientists from around
the world have proven are harmful to humans and all life forms.
The EMF ‘Cartel’ – Which
Includes Electric Power Utilities
Even superficially, the
‘closeness’ of this powerful ‘cartel’ can be seen from the sponsors of the International
Seminar on EMF Risk Perception and Communication” held in Ottawa, Aug. 31-Sept. 1, 1998. They were: the WHO – led
by the now infamous Dr. Michael Repacholi (see below); Health Canada; Industry
Canada; the Faculty of Medicine University of Ottawa (whose responsibilities
have since been transferred to the R. Samuel McLaughlin Centre – see Krewski,
below); the CTIA (Cellular Telephone Industry Association) - who lobby all governments
across the USA on behalf of its wireless/telecom member companies; the CWTA (Canadian
Wireless Telecommunications Association) - who lobby all governments across
Canada on behalf of its member companies; B.C. Hydro; Ontario Hydro, and Hydro
Québec - - at which appeared Dr. William F. Bailey (before he joined Exponent
Inc. See below). Incidentally, since 2008, the President and CEO of CWTA is
none other than fluently-bilingual
Dr. William Bailey is,
and has been since about 2000, a Principal consulting scientist with Exponent
Inc. of the
Dr James McNamee, of
HC, is also a Member of TC-95, as are other HC and Industry
Dr. Art Thansandote joined HC in 1991 and retired just recently, but, as “Scientist
Emeritus” he maintains close contact with the HC’s Consumer and Clinical
Protection Bureau. At HC he co-authored papers with Drs. Repacholi, Stuchly and
McNamee – the latter of whom is or was also an ICES TC-95 Member – at least in 2008!
Tellingly, Dr. Thansandote continues to function as Co-Chairman of the US
Military’s strategically-vital ICES’ TC-95, SC-4, a position he has held since
at least 2005! He remains a Member of
Prof. Daniel Krewski. Since 1998 has been the Director of the R. Samuel
McLaughlin Centre for Population Risk Assessment at the University of Ottawa,
which was founded and is funded by the cell phone industry. It has been said that
Dr. Krewski’s salary, at least in part, is also paid by the cell phone industry.
Previously, he had been the Director of Risk Management in HC’s Radiation
Protection Bureau. As
Within British Columbia, BC Hydro and Fortis BC have each seen fit to separately
retain the services of the afore-mentioned Dr. William F. Bailey, of Exponent
Inc., to defend them against any and all opposition to their corporate plans to
rollout wireless ‘Smart’ Meters. Here one needs to recall that Dr. Bailey is a
long-time colleague of Drs. Repacholi, Thansandote and McNamee; also that he has
a long history with IEEE/ICES, and is a member of the U.S. Military’s
omnipotent TC-95, along with HC’s former employee Dr. Art Thansandote. [Also
90] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96]
A Pivotal Player in Today’s
Corruption in EMFs – RF and ELF
Dr. Michael
Repacholi. In 1977, HC’s SC6 Exposure
Limits were established by industry-friendly Dr. Maria Stuchly assisted by her
then subordinate, Michael Repacholi (who received his PhD in 1980).
In
1992, on leaving what was then Health and Welfare Canada, Dr. Repacholi moved
to found ICNIRP, becoming its inaugural Chairman (He is now Chairman Emeritus),
where he and Dr. Anders Ahlbom* collaborated to establish EMF Exposure Limits
for ICNIRP. ICNIRP’s Guidelines proved to be very similar to those of SC6,
which Dr. Maria Stuchly, assisted by Michael Repacholi, had developed for HC. (Note:
In May, 2011,
In 1996, the WHO established its 10-year
(1996-2005), $250-million (USD) International EMF Project to evaluate the
health effects from exposure to EMF in the range from 0 to
In 1996, a
In 1999,
then Health and Welfare
“Precautionary Principle” –
Definition: “When there is plausible scientific
evidence of significant harm
from a proposed or ongoing activity, preventive or
corrective action should be
taken to reduce or eliminate that risk of harm, despite
residual scientific uncertainty
about cause and effect relationships.”
In 2001,
Dr. Michael Repacholi stated that, with regard to the EMF project: “Precautionary policies should not be applied
to EMFs!” He recruited utility representatives to help write the original
draft of the WHO document recommending exposure levels, and later asked them to
review the completed draft. Dr. Repacholi invited eight utility representatives
to attend task group meeting — the only observers who were invited. [102]
In 2001, the electric
power industry’s research arm, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI),
announced that Dr. Leeka Kheifets, a former student and protégée of Dr.
Repacholi, will take over day-to-day management of the WHO’s International EMF
Project in early July. She will report to Dr. Michael Repacholi. [103]
In 2002, the WHO’s own research agency,
In
2004, Dr. Repacholi advised national governments AGAINST setting stricter
exposure limits for exposures to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) to protect
children from leukemia! [Also 105]
In
2005, WHO convened a Task Group, headed by Dr. Michael Repacholi, to assess any
risks to health that might exist from ELF electric and magnetic fields (EMFs) in
the frequency range 0 to 100 kHz, and to develop ‘guidelines’ that would
protect the public. Note: “These guidelines are only designed to avoid
immediate high level hazards and do not consider prolonged low-level exposures
at all….. They are NOT intended to provide protection against possible cancer
induction by continued exposure at the lower field levels implicated in the
studies we have been considering at this workshop.” (1 to 3 mG) [106]
Further to the above, Dr.
Repacholi is documented as having invited power industry representatives to
participate actively in setting public health standards for EMFs emitted by powerlines
and transformers. It is important to note that this happened despite the fact
that Dr. Repacholi said himself to a Senate Committee Inquiry that: “The WHO does not allow industry to
participate in either standard setting or in health risk assessment. The WHO
takes the view that there cannot be industry representation on standard setting
working groups. There cannot be someone on the working group who is having an
influence on health effects for an industry when they derive benefit from that
industry.” [107]
On July 5, 2005, it was published that Dr. Repacholi –
while functioning as Coordinator of the WHO’s Radiation and Environmental
Health Unit – admitted that he had received $150,000 annually directly from the
cellular phone industry with additional money for meetings and travel! [107]
Dr.
Repacholi retired from the WHO in 2006, whereupon he became a consultant for the
electric power Industry. [108]
Dr. Repacholi was also
involved in a follow-up report on
In 2007,
Dr. Repacholi admitted that: “Half of the WHO EMF Project funding came from industry”!
[109]
Professor Olle Johansson of
the Karolinska Institute,
Industrialized societies
depend on electrification, and electric utilities constitute the cornerstone of
all modern economies. They therefore have huge influence on senior governments.
It is unfortunate but entirely understandable that Nicola Tesla, the inventor
of alternating current (A/C) electricity, could not have foreseen that
invisible EMFs would prove to be harmful to humans and all forms of life.
In conclusion, A/C electricity is the cornerstone of
every economy, and electrical and electronic
devices are everywhere – each and every one of which emits harmful EMFs at either
RF and/or ELF (60 Hz) frequencies (not to mention ‘dirty electricity’). When
viewed in conjunction with the profit-driven manufacturers of these often useful,
invariably convenient and, in the case of Smart phones, truly addictive devices,
this represents the largest and most powerful industry / interest group in the
world - the electrical Industry! These huge corporations with their bottomless
pockets exert enormous influence over R and D scientists, government regulatory
agencies, politicians, the media and ultimately public opinion. Such is the
control/influence of industry over governments everywhere today that the very
future of mankind is now literally in jeopardy! Unless, somehow, the Canadian
medical community can wake up and realize what is happening to them - and all
Canadians - today’s emerging epidemics can only worsen and eventually will envelop
the entire globe.
These are mind-boggling, incomprehensibly preposterous
times to which we are all prisoners and none of us can escape, yet
Sincerely,
James G. (“Jerry”) Flynn, Captain (Retired)
Boswer, B.C., V0R 1G0
778-424-9609
References
[1]
http://www.wirelessimpacts.org/science/becker.html
[2] http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Sam-Slides.pdf
[3] http://www.microwavenews.com/news-center/sam-milham-appreciation
[4] http://lifeenergies.com/he-emr/
[5] http://www.stayonthetruth.com/neil-cherry.php
[6] https://jenner.com/system/assets/assets/6135/original/REFJ
Forcade.pdf?1327948224
[7] http://www.emfs.info/limits/5060-2/
[8] http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs322/en/
[9] http://www.hydroquebec.com/fields/pdf/pop_23_01.pdf
[10] http://www.emfs.info/limits/limits-usa/
[11] https://www.bchydro.com/content/dam/BCHydro/customer-portal/documents/corporate/community/understanding-electric-magnetic-fields%202013.pdf
[12] http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/consult/_2014/safety_code_6-code_securite_6/final_finale-eng.php
[13] http://www.feb.se/EMFguru/Research/emf-emr/EMR-Reduces-Melatonin.htm
[14] http://lifeenergies.com/he-emr/
[15] http://www.nzine.co.nz/features/neilcherry3.html/
[16] http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/emhealth.asp
[17] http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/elfhealth.pdf
[18] http://www.feb.se/Bridlewood/HEALTH.HTM
[19] http;//www.wirelessimpacts.org/science/becker.html
[20] http://lifeenergies.com/he-emr/
[21 http://www.midtod.com/9603/voltage.phtml
[22] http://www.emfct.com/breatcancer.htm
[23] http://www.emfct.com/breatcancer.htm
[24] http://www.electric-fields.com/Henshaw_Prof_Denis_Ireland_10_Feb_2014.pdf
[25] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2897614/Working-night-shifts-increases-risk-heart-disease-cancer-study-warns.html
[26] http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/elfhealth.pdf
[27] http://www.electric-fields.com/Henshaw_Prof_Denis_Ireland_10_Feb_2014.pdf
[28] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2954516/
[29] http://lifeenergies.com/he-emr/
[30] https://retasite.wordpress.com/2012/11/02/overhead-high-voltage-lines-lower-property-values/
[31] http://www.feb.se/EMFguru/Elf/houston-trans-lines.html
[32] https://www.emfscientist.org/
[33]
http://ehtrust.org/france-new-national-law-bans-wifi-nursery-school/
[34] http://www.albany.edu/ihe/assets/Scientist_Declaration.pdf
[35] http://www.stopglobalwifi.org/
[36] http://www.electric-fields.com/Henshaw_Prof_Denis_Ireland_10_Feb_2014.pdf
[37] http://microwavenews.com/short-takes-archive/council-europe-urges-precaution
[38] http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/resolutions-and-appeals/
[39] http://www.magdahavas.com/
[40] http://www.weepinitiative.org/LINKEDDOCS/scientific/20080117_bevington_emfs.pdf
[41]http://www.electric-fields.com/Henshaw_Prof_Denis_Ireland_10_Feb_2014.pdf
[42] http://www.iddd.de/umtsno/puzen.htm
[43] “Mobile Phone and Mast
Radiation – How Dangerous Are These”, by Eileen
O’Connor of the EM Radiation
Research Trust, October 1, 2005
[44] http://lifeenergies.com/he-emr/
[45] http://www.electric-fields.com/Henshaw_Prof_Denis_Ireland_10_Feb_2014.pdf
[46] http://lifeenergies.com/he-emr/
[47] http://www.esdjournal.com/techpapr/elfhealth.pdf
[48] http://microwavenews.com/news/backissues/j-a01issue.pdf
[49] http://www.microwavenews.com/news/backissues/m-j01issue.pdf
[50] http://www.wirelessimpacts.org/science/becker.html
[52]
http://lifeenergies.com/pollution-reports/emfp11/
[53]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1310936/
[54] http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/reports/ottawa.pdf
[55] http://www.feb.se/Bridlewood/WORLD.HTM
[56] http://lifeenergies.com/pollution-reports/emfp6/
[57] http://lifeenergies.com/he-emr/
[58] http://www.feb.se/Bridlewood/HEALTH.HTM
[59] http://www2.cruzio.com/~rbedard/ncrp_.html
[60] http://microwavenews.com/news/backissues/j-f95issue.pdf
[61]
http://microwavenews.com/news/backissues/m-a95issue.pdf
[62] http://ipmall.info/risk/vol5/winter/abt.htm
[63]
http://www.lessemf.com/pamphlet.html
[64] http://microwavenews.com/news/backissues/n-d94issue.pdf
[65]
http://www.lessemf.com/pamphlet.html
[66] http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/emhealth.asp
[67]
http://lifeenergies.com/pollution-reports/emfp6/
[68] http://www.rense.com/health/pwr_line.htm
[69] http://lifeenergies.com/pollution-reports/emfp10/
[70] http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/06/24/epa-knew-emfs-were-a-probable-human-carcinogen-decades-ago-and-covered-it-up/
[71] http://safelevel.com/news.html
[72] http://www.ecomall.com/greenshopping/memf.htm
[73]
http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/emhealth.asp
[74] http://www.electricalpollution.com/Lloyd_Morganexcerpts.html
[74]
http://altered-states.net/barry/newsletter165/
[75]
http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/science/emhealth.asp
[76]
http://www.rd.usda.gov/files/UWP_WI64-Dairyland_CapXHRLC_FEIS-AppH.pdf
[77] http://educate-yourself.org/cn/neilcherrycellphonerisks07may01.shtml
[78]
http://www.hydroone.com/ourcommitment/environment/documents/emf/sick_
kids_electromagnetic_radiation_and_cancer_fears.pdf
[79]
http://lifeenergies.com/pollution-reports/emfp6/
[80] http://www.i-sis.org.uk/FOI3.php
[81]
http://www.who.int/peh-emf/meetings/2Rubtsova.pdf
[82]
http://www.lauralee.com/news/fieldsofinfluence.htm
[83]
http://www.ecomall.com/greenshopping/memf.htm
[84A] http://www.ices-emfsafety.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/TC95-SC4-2014-january_minutes.pdf
[84B] http://emfguide.itu.int/pdfs/C95.1-2005.pdf
[84C] 110] http://www.national-toxic-encephalopathy-foundation.org/Exponent_Report.pdf
[85]
http://www.magdahavas.com/health-canada-admits-safety-code-6-guideline-for-microwave-radiation-is-based-only-on-thermal-effects/
[86] http://c4st.org/safety-code-6-review
[87]
http://www.etsist.upm.es/estaticos/catedra-coitt/web_salud_medioamb/Informes/informes_PDF/rf/HealthCanada/99ehd237.pdf
[88]
http://microwavenews.com/news-center/rsc-sc6
[89] http://www.cqlpe.ca/pdf/TickingTimeBomb10-20-2013.pdf
[90] http://www.iddd.de/umtsno/puzmud.htm
[91]
http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/reports/progrep0405.pdf
[92] https://www.aaemonline.org/pdf/BCEMFResolution.pdf
[93] Reference: “Inquiry into
Electromagnetic Radiation”, Report of the Senate Environment, Communications,
Information Technology and the Arts References Committee, Section 4.115, page
151, May 2001
[94] microwavenews.com 5.7.05
[95] The Nuclear Reporter #634
9/16/05 — Shivani]
[96] http://lifeenergies.com/he-emr/
[97]
http://www.iddd.de/umtsno/puzmud.htm
[98] http://microwavenews.com/news-tags/michael-repacholi
[99] http://lifeenergies.com/pollution-reports/emfp9/
[100] http://www.ices-emfsafety.org/committees/tc95-subcommittees/
[101 http://www.rense.com/health/pwr_line.htm
[102]
http://lifeenergies.com/pollution-reports/emfp9/
[103]
http://microwavenews.com/news/backissues/m-j01issue.pdf
[104] http://www.ices-emfsafety.org/committees/tc95-subcommittees/
[105]
http://www.iaff.org/hs/facts/CellTowerFinal.asp
[106] http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/the-british-columbia-1
[107] http://www.salzburg.gv.at/who_conflict.pdf
[108] http://www.mastsanity.org/home-89/168-repacholi-admits-interference-from-the-industry-at-the-world-health-organisation-emf-project.html
[109] http://lifeenergies.com/pollution-reports/emfp9/