NEW Barrie Trower WiFi Report -
Humanity At The Brink
By Barrie Trower September8-24-13
With
Deference to all Scientists: this Research Report has been written
for all students and non-scientists to understand.
Abstract
As
stated by University Researchers, Government Scientists and
International Scientific Advisors; a minimum of 57.7% of
schoolgirls
exposed to low-level microwave radiation (Wi-fi) are
at risk of
suffering stillbirth, foetal abnormalities or
genetically damaged
children, when they give birth. Any genetic
damage may pass to
successive generations.
Wifi a Thalidomide in the Making Who
Cares?
Professor John R Goldsmith, International / Advisor
Consultant for
R.F. Communication, Epidemiology and
Communications Sciences
Advisor to the World Health Organisation,
Military and University
Advisor, Researcher; wrote concerning the
low level exposure of
microwave irradiation (below thermal level)
incident upon women:
“
Of the microwave-exposed women,
47.7% had miscarriages
prior to the 7
th
week of
pregnancy....”(1)
The level of irradiation incident upon the
women was stated, as from,
five microwatts per centimetre
squared. This level of irradiation may
seem meaningless to a
non-scientist; however, when I say that it is
below
what most
schoolgirls will receive in a classroom of wi-fi
transmitters,
from the age of approximately five years upwards, this
level
becomes more meaningful.
A distinction here must be made and a
very important one: schoolgirls
are not women
. Schoolgirls
are children and children are both
neurologically and
physiologically different from adults. A child’s
brain
tissue / bone marrow has different electrical conductivity
properties than adults due to the higher water content (2) (this
renders
the Specific Absorption Rate obsolete
). Children’s
absorption of
microwave radiation can be ten times higher than
adults. Permanent
low-level microwave exposure can induce chronic
nitrosative and
oxidative ‘stress’ thence, damage the
cellular mitochondria
(mitochondropathy). This ‘stress’
can cause irreversible mitochondrial
DNA damage (mitochondrial
DNA is ten times more susceptible to
oxidative and nitrosative
‘stress’ than the DNA in the cell nucleus).
Mitochondrial DNA is irreparable due to its low histone protein
content, therefore any damage (genetic or otherwise) can be
transmitted to all successive generations through the maternal
line. (3)
Hence, we are subjecting each successive female
generation to harm.
Whether these two ten-fold increases ‘merge’
to become 57.7% or are
additional, thence equal 67.7% of those to
suffer, is a moot point.
Either way we are facing the equivalent
of a pandemic. I was invited to
present a lecture at Brighton
University recently and one Doctor
commented on a +60% foetal birth rate
damage from exposed farm
animals. All mammalian species will of
course suffer the same
consequence resulting from low-level
microwave irradiation. There is
very little difference
‘biologically’ between our embryonic cells.
I invite
the Reader to peruse my diagram and / or read my simple
explanation
concerning the microwaving of the ovarian follicles in
schoolgirls.
Simple Explanation
Imagine you are five years
old, in school and sitting with a wi-fi laptop
near your abdomen.
Theoretically, your ovaries can become irradiated
until you leave
school at aged 16-18 years old. When you become
pregnant, every
one of your follicles (to become eggs) will have been
microwaved.
Hence, you may or may not deliver a healthy child.
Should you
become a pregnant as a student, your embryo (for its first
100
days if it is female) is producing approximately 400,000 follicles
(within its ovaries) for future child-birth.
The problem is
that these developing follicle cells do not have the
cellular
protection of mature adult cells. Consequently your
‘Grandchild’
may have had every single follicle cell irradiated and
damaged
prior to its conception. Therefore when your child becomes
an
adult (with its irradiated follicles) there is a greater likelihood
of its
child (your Grand-daughter) suffering the ailments
previously
mentioned, during conception / embryonic and foetal
development
stages.
Beyond Belief
The shocking truth is,
not only was all of this known and documented
long before wi-fi
was ever put in front of children, but the dangerous
biological
effects were concealed (as they are to this day) from the
general
public, in order to protect the industries profit.
Professor
Goldsmith writes:
“
.....effects from exposure to RF
radiation in certain
populations: reproductive
effects.....increased spontaneous
abortion.....increased
incidence of childhood and other
cancers.....”
(1)
Confirming this with more than 2000 references is the Naval
Medical
Research Institute in their document: ‘Bibliography
of Reported
Biological Phenomena (Effects) and Clinical
Manifestations Attributed
to Microwave and Radio-Frequency
Radiation’ highlight ‘......Altered
Menstrual
Activity / Altered Foetal Development.....’ (4)
The World
Health Organization’s ‘International Symposium’
Research
Agreement No. 05-609-04 ‘Biological Effects and
Health Hazards of
Microwave Radiation’ emphasizes in its
350 pages: Biological effects,
health and excess mortality from
artificial irradiation of Radio
Frequency Microwaves. Section 28
deals with problems concerning
Reproductive Function.
This
document was classed as ‘Top Secret’ and its contents
withheld
by WHO and ICNIRP (International Commission on
Non-Ionizing
Radiation Protection). (5)
Eldon Byrd, a
scientist for the Naval Surface Weapon Centre of the US
Navy, in
one of his 1986 lectures on the effects of low-level
microwaves,
is referenced as stating:
‘
.....we can alter the
behaviour of cells, tissue.....cause up to six
times higher
foetus mortality and birth defects....’. (6)
Finally, the
Mobile Telecommunications Industry carried out a very
thorough
and exhaustive scientific study on its own product. This
industries
conclusion was:
Sec. 7 “.....it can be concluded that
electro-magnetic fields with
frequencies in the mobile
telecommunications range do
play a
role in the development of
cancer.
”
“
.....Direct damage
on the DNA
as well as influences
on the
DNA synthesis
and DNA repair
mechanisms
.....” (7)
(Note I have underscored the
relevant words here.)
Note: DNA synthesis is essential for
healthy embryonic / foetal /
child’s growth.
With
these few of the roughly 8000 research articles showing this
phenomena; in order to protect this industries’ profit, the
United States
Defence Intelligence Agency sent a ‘document’
to ‘advanced nations’
describing the problem and
suggesting ‘how to deceive the public’.
It
read:
“
.....if the more advanced nations of the West are
strict in the
enforcement of stringent exposure standards, there
could be
unfavourable effects on industrial output.....exposed to
microwave radiation below thermal levels experience more.....”
(8)
NB: Industrial output is of course...profit. A very
relaxed exposure
standard also makes it very difficult to take
the industry to court.
This (and two other documents with
ref. 8) then continues to list many
physiological and
neurological dangers from low-level: below thermal,
microwave
irradiation inc: blood disorders, heart problems, psychiatric
symptoms and ‘menstrual disorders’.
*Wi-fi is
of course, below thermal low-level microwave irradiation.
*
In order to appease the US Government, some Governments adopted
the ICNIRP guideline, whereby, the only safety limit is just
six-
minutes of warming. Which means: if you do not feel too warm
in six
minutes, wi-fi is deemed to be safe.
No
consideration at all has been given to the published ‘below
thermal’
cellular interaction as listed by several
countries including the United
States; which were (and are) known
to cause: cancer, severe
neuropathological symptoms, foetal
defects and literally hundreds of
illnesses related to cellular
disorders.
Countries following ICNIRP continue to argue that
their six minute
warming effect is all that is required regarding
microwave irradiation.
Should the Reader be wondering whether
I am ‘as mad as a box of
frogs’ and thinking ‘no
government would ever harm its citizens for
money, especially
pregnant women’; I invite the Reader to investigate
Government
decisions behind: smoking, asbestos, BSE (mad-cow
disease), lead
in petrol, experiments on 20,000 UK serving military
personnel
serving in the 1960’s, thalidomide and of course Agent
Orange
sprayed over the food crops in Vietnam. To this day, many
global
birth defects stem from these Government / Government
Scientific
/ Military decisions:
with industrial advisors
.
If
further evidence is required, I invite the Reader to read documents
released under the Freedom of Information Act; namely,
Operations:
Pandora, MK Ultra, MK Chaos, Cointelpro, MK Delta, MK
Naomi,
MK Search, Bluebird, Artichoke, Chatter, Sleeping Beauty
and Grill
Flame.
Here, secret experiments carried out by the
Military / Government
scientists upon unsuspecting civilians,
namely: students, servicemen,
psychiatric patients, poor,
children over the age of 4 years, pregnant
women, Muslims,
Catholics, prisoners, handicapped, deaf, blind,
homosexuals,
single women, elderly, school children, ‘marginal
groups’
and dissidents; served to increase their knowledge and
understanding
of; what is commonly known as...Stealth Warfare.
Progress
on the study of illnesses caused by low-level microwave
irradiation
continues to this day. One current study on cancer and
neurological
harm continues until 2018 and involves women who
could be
pregnant. (9)
Progress Reports are also fed back to Governmental
Scientists:
“
.....students will understand the nature of
RF...bioeffects
research, including human / animal
studies.....students will
become familiar with current state of
knowledge on potential
health effects RF, such as cancer, memory
loss, and birth
defects.” (10)
NB: RF has become a generic term (Radio
Frequency) to avoid using
the term ‘microwave’. It
poses less ‘safety queries’ as the word ‘radio’
itself, which used to refer to ‘long wave radio’ was
domestically non-
threatening.
Intentional
Ignorance
Governmental Intransigence forces a moratorium upon the
risks of
exposure to future generations. Both the Communications
Industry and
Governmental studies have proved that protein
synthesis (the using of
chemical structures to ‘build’
the roughly 4050 foetal and 4500 adults
designated biological /
neurological structures) can be influenced by
low-level microwave
irradiation. This moratorium seems to spread to
organizations
either relying on Governmental funding, or for whatever
reason;
acquiescence. However, not all research departments suppress
the
truth.
A brilliant paper published by Dundee University confirms
that low-
level microwave irradiation, unable to cause any heating
(thermal)
effect, can affect cellular signaling processes. (11)
The Main Risks to Children
These biological processes
described as being ‘influenced’ by low-
level
microwave irradiation may not just damage foetal growth; relying
on
the same biological processes are:
Blood Brain Barrier requires
18 months to form and protects
the brain from toxins. It is known
to be effected.
Myelin Sheath requires 22 years to build its 122
layers. It is
responsible for all thinking, organ and muscle
processes.
Brain requires 20 years to develop (I can assure you,
cell
phones do not help in its development).
Immune System
requires 18 years to develop. Bone marrow
and Bone Density are
known to be affected by low-level
microwaves as are the immune
systems’ white blood cells.
Bones requires 28 years to develop as
mentioned the moisture
content of children makes both the ‘soft
bones’ and marrow
particularly attractive to microwave
irradiation. Bone marrow
produces blood cells.
Clearly,
our decision makers are overlooking a child illness pandemic
hitherto unknown in our 40,000 generations of civilization; which
can
involve over a half of the World’s exposed mothers /
children.
The Very Sad Truth
I have been very honoured to
address approximately 40 Royals,
Governments, Leaders of
Governments, Leaders of Peoples and
Government Officials over the
years.
My address (text) to one King concerning the numbers
of ill children
was placed on the internet. (12)
I
referenced over 200 cancer / leukaemia clusters in schools (up to the
time of data collection) from low level microwave transmitters in
schools. There were many different types of cancers, leukaemias,
miscarriages and breast cancers of staff. These continue, mostly
only
recorded locally, to this day.
When this was
discussed in the English Parliament (as one of the EU
Countries
involved), a Minister dismissed it and lied to the House of
Commons.
My request to prove this lie was denied.
Possibly, the most
respected children’s charity in the World: UNICEF,
joined
forces with the World’s leading authority on the effects of
harm
from low-level microwave irradiation:
The Russian
National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation
Protection: in their
research document ‘Health Effect on Children and
Teenagers’
found;
85% increase in Central Nervous System
Disorders
36% increase in epilepsy
11% increase in mental
retardation
82% increase in blood immune disorders and
Risk to
Foetus
. (13)
NB. The Reader may think that the cell phone
irradiation is different
from wi-fi as it has more power. In fact
wi-fi can be more
harmful
because of its lower power! Low
power can enter the body and cause
harm. All electromagnetic
waves are accumulative. If they are below
the body’s
threshold to cause activation of the necessary proteins
required
to defend and repair tissues, the damage accumulates very
slowly
and is undetectable like a cancer. Think of sunbathing on a
cloudy
day, you can still burn your skin.
The Good Guys
I have a
list of nine countries (some of whom I am working with) who
are
actively, either taking wi-fi out of schools or in the legal
argument-
stage of this process. I decline to publically name
these countries as my
actions may interfere with their legal
negotiations.
The Parliamentary Assembly (Assemblee
Parlimentaire) Council of
Europe Document 12608, published on
6.5.2011 in section 8.3.2.
states:
‘
.....ban
all mobile phones, DECTphones or Wi-Fi or WLAN
systems from
classrooms and schools.....’
For legal reasons this had
to be changed to a ‘wired system is
preferred’.
However, the meaning is clear.
In a translated document,
Professor Yuri Grigoriev of the Russian
Committee for Non
Ionizing Radiation Protection wrote on 19.6.2012
‘
.....recommend
the use of wired networks and not networks
using the wireless
broadband access systems, including wi-fi,
in schools and
educational establishments.’
A document dated 25.3.2013 (updated
from 19.3.2013) by the
Executive Committee of the American
Academy of Environmental
Medicine wrote a letter to the Los
Angeles Unified School District
with the following
recommendation:
‘
.....do not add to the burden of public
health by installing
blanket wireless internet connections in Los
Angeles Schools.’
Just prior to this in December 2012
the American Academy of
Pediatrics (representing 60,000
Paediatricians) wrote to Congress
requesting more protection from
low-level microwave irradiation for
children and pregnant women:
with regard to wi-fi in schools, they
write:
‘
.....this
is an unprecedented exposure with unknown outcome
on the health
and reproductive potential of a generation.’ (14)
In
2002, 36,000 Physicians and Scientists etc. signed the ‘Freiburg
Appeal’. Ten years hence, it has been re-launched. It
specifically warns
against the use of Wi-fi and the irradiation
of children, adolescents and
pregnant women. ‘Freiburg’
is an International Doctors’ Appeal.
The Reader will
appreciate that collectively there are approximately
100,000 of
the World’s most knowledgeable professionals
expostulating
this same warning.
As an aside, should the Reader be
wondering why I have not
mentioned school-boys and whether they
can be affected in a similar
way to girls: the answer is ‘yes’.
DNA sperm fragmentation from wi-fi levels of irradiation, have
been
published. (15) It would require many more pages to comment
upon
this phenomenon and there is already a plethora of data both
available
and published.
Pulsing / Modulations
During the
‘Cold War’ conflict, whilst I was collating effects from
microwave pulses / modulations caused by brain entrainment,
resonance (both cyclotronic and circadian), rectification (at
boundaries
within the body) generated by electrically induced
phase transition; it
came to my attention that a list needed to
be published for all
microwave communication systems. (16)
In
this Open Letter, I list 1 to 40 Hz (pulses / modulations per second)
and their corresponding neurological / physiological response.
In
his most explanatorily descriptive paper, Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy
writes.....
‘
.....For example, Grigoriev et. Al.
(2010) showed that 30 days
exposure to unmodulated 2450 MHz
microwave radiation
triggered a small but significant increase in
anti-brain
antibodies in the blood of rats.....which could then
result in an
auto immune attack on the brain and / or nervous
system. An
example of an auto immune disease of the brain is
Graves
disease in which the pituitary gland (at the base of the
brain) is
affected.’ (17)
NB. 2450 M Hz is the wi-fi
frequency.
If you add the pulse / modulation frequency to the
above; fatigue,
depression, psychiatric problems (such as anger),
loss of appetite and
problems with movement can also be
induced.
The Bad Guys
With gargantuan profits to be made, it is
of no surprise that the English
Parliamentary system choose to
follow ICNIRP and their well
established ‘Active Denial’
policy.
I became familiar with our ‘corruption’ when
during the late 60’s 70’s,
I was commissioned to
investigate (under a programme initiated by Sir
William Melvin
(1911)) corruption within the hierarchy of the London
Metropolitan
Police and the non-elected Members of the English
Parliament. Should the Reader be
dismissive of such actions, I suggest
looking at any of our
Sunday newspapers over the past 45 years,
including now.
When
a Reverend lady wrote to a Minister, Nick Gibb MP, concerning
Wi-fi
in schools, his standard reply (which I have seen many times)
stated:
“.....advice given.....by UK Health Protection
Agency..... ‘There is no
consistent evidence of health
effects from RF exposures below
guideline levels and no reason
why schools and others should not use
Wi-fi equipment.”
(18)
This letter is designed to deceive (and it is very
successful). Look to
the words ‘no consistent evidence’.
Let me explain please.
If I were to carry out an experiment
on every single person who went
through the doors of your main
airport on any busy day and told them
that they must drink one
pint of beer and smoke ten cigarettes a day
forever; some would
react immediately, especially children. Others
would react over
days, weeks, months and years (many years in some
cases). Then
there would be those who would thoroughly enjoy the
experiment
and probably never be ill. That does not mean that alcohol
and
cigarettes are safe. It shows that people are not homogenous (all
alike / identical). In other words, the conclusion of my
experiment
would be that there is: ‘no consistent
evidence
’.
Other Ministerial letters usually say:
“most of our research” or “most
of our
scientists” both of which are equally meaningless.
What
they never say is: Wi-fi is safe.
It will come as no surprise
to the Reader to learn that I have been
refused permission to
have a face-to-face meeting with my MP, Mr
Mel Stride. Hence my
Member of Parliament has successfully brought
the ‘shutters
down’ on any access I may have had to Government. This
act
by Mr Stride became a ‘feature’ in our West Country
newspaper by
leading Journalist Paul James. (19)
During my last attempt to contact my
MP, his Secretary, Dominic just
hung-up the telephone on me.
Years ago, when I started to ‘advise caution’ re
microwaving children /
pregnant women; the Academic Registrar of
my own University
(Exeter) forbade me from ever communicating
with it, ever again. A
similar message came from Dr. Jamie Harle
of the Open University
(Medical Physics), who said: “Your
work is too political.”
Clearly in England, some
universities and some parliamentary persons
are more afraid of
governmental ‘reprisals’ than telling the truth.
Regardless of the consequences.
Two Womens’
Stories
The Real Price of Intentional Ignorance and Greed. Those
Consequences.
Ten telephone calls a day would not be
unusual for me. I even receive
calls Christmas Day / Easter
Sunday. Two calls which summarize
those from women are
illustrated below. Both are actual conversations.
i.
“
.....my daughter had just died. I am
holding her hand. She has
just had her 11
th
birthday and
she was number 11 to die since
the transmitter for Wi-fi was put
near her and others’ desk.....”
ii.
“
.....my child is one of several with cancer /
birth genetic
problems. These only started after the transmitter
was turned
on. My worries are two-fold and take every second of
my life.
Will my child ever marry or find a partner and be happy?
What
will happen when I die? I know I will die worrying.
Regardless
of who is to blame, it is me, the Mother who carries
guilt and
responsibility.....” (20)
I Ask for Readers’
Help, Please.
Imagine 57.7% of all of the schoolgirls with
Wi-fi in their classrooms:
all day all year all through their
school career, in every country using
it, in the World!
In
just two generations we could have more dead / sick infants than
resulted from both World Wars. And, these are not my figures,
they
come from Government advisors / research.
Advanced
requests for this ‘Paper’ have been received from
Royalty,
Governmental Officers (outside of the UK) and people I
will describe
as ‘interesting’.
As shutters
fall blocking every direction I try to turn, I ask: “Can the
Reader succeed in preventing this ‘Pandemic’ where I
will fail?”
I have two requests:
i.
Would a Royal or Leading Governmental Official please
ask
the British Prime Minister, face to face, why he told my MP,
Mr Stride, that he is ‘too busy’ to see me for just
one hour to
discuss this issue.
ii.
If every Reader sends just two copies of this Paper to people
who may be able make a decision (preferably influential
women);
with mathematical progression the original 100
advanced requests
will soon land on a desk of somebody who
can make a
difference.
International Challenge
When I am invited to
speak in countries, I invariably end up on the
radio / TV news /
documentary channels. Thence, I issue a challenge:
I ask for
any scientist(s) from industry / government to ‘humiliate’
me
live ‘on-air’ with their expert knowledge by
answering one question:
“
What is the safe level of
microwave irradiation for the ovarian
follicles during the first
100 days development of the embryo?”
To date, not a
single scientist will appear and face me.
I mention this
because it is a question the Reader can ask any decision
maker,
school Principal / Governor etc.
Should any person provide
the answer, the next statement is:
“
Fine we will
send it to a Leading Scientific Journal for independent
Peer
Review.” (With your research). (21)
The Solution
Education need not suffer if Wi-fi is withdrawn world-wide. We
have
telephone lines fibre-optic cable.
The argument
against these options is the cost. Compared to the future
medical
costs (forgetting the human cost), phone / fibre-cable shows to
be
a very cheap option.
Thank you.
Barrie Trower
3
Flowers Meadow
Liverton
Devon TQ12 6UP
United Kingdom
In UK - 01626 821014
World 00 44 1626 821014
(This
Paper is copyright free)
Epilogue
Please note I have always
worked free of charge and will represent
any person in the world
without cost.
PLEASE SEE ADDENDUM
Addendum Recent
Publications
Professors’ / Doctors’ Panagopoulos,
Johnasson and Carlo describe in
their (June 2013 Published) Paper
how man-made electromagnetic
waves (as used in the
communications industry) can cause interference,
hence induced
oscillations, from these polarized waves. This in turn,
can
induce biological alterations and render the SAR (Specific
Absorption Rate) obsolete.
They write:
•
Man-made electromagnetic waves...they are polarized...
•
....can produce interference effect...This induced
oscillation
will be most intense on the free particles which
carry a net
electric charge...a part of its energy...is
transferred to the
charged / polar molecules of the
medium...within biological
tissue there will be additional energy
absorption by the water
dipoles...proteins, lipids or nucleic
acids, which will also be
forced to oscillate by the applied
field.
•
...man-made EMF’s can produce
severe biological alterations
such as DNA damage without heating
the biological
tissue...may lead to cancer, neurodegenerative
deceases,
reproductive declines or even heritable
mutations...conductivity
varies for different tissues and
different field frequencies..The
relative permittivity of an
adult brain is calculated to be
around 40 while the corresponding
value for a young child’s
brain is between 60 and 80
resulting in almost double the
radiation absorption and SAR...
•
...SAR offers no information at all with respect to
frequency,
waveform or modulation... (Ref (22))
Dr Dimitris
Panagopoulos, Dep. of Biology, University of Athens also
writes
in his 2013 paper: Electromagnetic Interaction Between
Environmental
Fields and Living Systems Determines Health and Well
Being:
Disturbances in the
communication between individual body
clocks can desynchronize
the circadian system, which in turn
may lead to unwellness,
chronic fatigue, decreased
performance, obesity, neuropsychiatric
disorders, and the
development of different diseases...
•
...endogenous electrical balance in living organisms
cannot
occur in the presence of unnatural man-made
electromagnetic
pollution..... GSM mobile phone radiation is
found to cause
DNA damage on insect reproductive cells (gametes)
and
adversely affect reproduction for intensities down to 1
microwatt per centimetre squared after only a few minutes
exposure..... (Ref (23))