Albert Einstein
"I have no doubt in my mind that at the present time, the greatest polluting element in the earth's environment is the proliferation of electromagnetic fields. I consider that to be far greater on a global scale than warming and the increase in chemical elements in the environment."
Robert O. Becker, MD
"Americans aren't aware of the dangers of electromagnetic radiation. We're endangering ourselves from TVs, cellular phones, neon lights, electric light bulbs...It didn't have to be this way."
Tom and Ray Magliozzi, NPR "Car talk"
"Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) is a clinical syndrome. Mechanisms underlying the symptoms of EHS are biologically plausible and that many organic physiologic responses occur following EMF exposure."
Iris G. Udasin, MD/Professor - EOHSI Clinical Center, Rutgers University."
"I'd rather I was shot. I'd rather there was an overt hole in my body that I knew that we could try to fix, as opposed to what's happening now."
Marc Polymeropoulos, U.S. Agent mutilated by Russian stealth warfare.
"This international consensus report pleads for the acknowledgement of EHS as a distinct neuropathological disorder and for its inclusion in the WHO International Classification of Diseases."
Dominique Belpomme, et al
"Adverse effects observed at exposures below the assumed threshold SAR include non-thermal induction of reactive oxygen species, DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, carcinogenicity, sperm damage, and neurological efects, including electromagnetic hypersensitivity"
International Commission on the Biological Efects of Electromagnetic Fields (ICBE-EMF)
"Babies are being killed by hospitals"
Arthur Firstenberg, President of Cellular Phone Task Force.
"Epidemiological studies show a rise in behavioral disorders among children whose mothers were heavy cellphone users while pregnant, while lab research found hyperactivity and reduced memory in mice exposed in the womb to cellphone radiation. The evidence is really, really strong."
Peter Elkind, ProPublica
"Cancer is Striking More Young People"
Brianna Abbot, WSJ. Oblivious to the obvious. Wreckless disregard for the anhilation of life by man-made EMF.
"Cancer Striking Younger Woman."
"Some experts are beginning to acknowledge that the environment may be contributing to ealy onset cancer. 'It strongly points to the possibility that environmental exposures are contributing toi the rise of cancers in younger people.'"
Neil Iyengar, Oncologist Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
"WHO Study Links Cell Phone Radiation with Cancer."
The findings of this systematic review indicate that there is evidence that RF EMF exposure increases the incidence of cancer.
WHO.
"RFK Jr. and Dr. Paul Heroux Discuss the Future of Wireless"
"Around 2-3% of the population might be severely affected, with a larger percentage possibly mildly impacted."
RFK Jr on widespread EHS cases.
Altered development in rodent brain calls after 900 Mhz RF exposure
"Key cellular events for brain ontogenesis are likely to undergo changes with RF-EMF 900 Mhz exposure during early development."
PERITOX Laboratory U. of Picardie Jules Verne, France.
Information on this website is intended to assist those with Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) - a neurodegenerative disease which incurs debilitating symptoms from exposure to ultra-low energy Electromagnetic Fields (EMF). Since everyone is exposed to ever increasing EMF loads on a daily basis, this site may be of interest to the general public. Mounting evidence proves that non-thermal EMF causes deleterious biological affects, even at extremely low levels.
Radio frequency (RF)/microwave radiation intensity is rising at an alarming, unsustainable rate as wireless networks are rolled out to download and stream ever more data. The threat of universal wireless internet access looms, with thousands of satellites, balloons. and millions of distributed antennas beaming 5G/Wifi on every inch of Earth. Most jobs require endless hours on a computer, WiFi has gone mainstream in schools, leaving the vulnerable behind and will eventually undermine humanity as "schoolchildren are at risk". Children are increasingly dying of neurological cancers, such as brain tumors with nearly every child holding a smart phone. Suicide as a result of EHS is not unheard of.
New cars employ electronic gadgets (including RF identifiers, RADAR, WiFi), and power lines are producing stronger magnetic fields as usage increases as cars are recharged. To make things worse, wireless "smart meters" are being installed by power companies against peoples permission and making many sick, and unable to inhabit their own homes. Soon, every dishwasher and refrigerator will be equipped with WiFi which cannot be turned off. "This is genocide part I", "This is genocide part II". Those with compromised, hypersensitive, unfit neuro cellular membranes must cope with a morbidly curtailed life. "Listen to a plea from a medical school professor regarding the dangers of 5G and electrosensitivity.."
It has been estimated that a sub-group consisting of 3% of the population suffers from EHS. That is just an estimate, as fewer have a severe case, whereas many more are mild. The right to pursuit happiness is being stripped from people who are EMF refugees. Yet the mainstream "medical community in the U.S. is oblivious to the condition", putting those that suffer in a very vulnerable situation. "Some MDs are catching on - I" "Some MDs are catching on - II" "Some MDs are catching on - III>"
The Russians knew of "Radio Wave sickness" as far back as the 1940s since the advent of RADAR. The "Navy" outlined numerous biological effects in 1971. Noteworthy is the use of key word "electromagnetic radiation injury" According to "NASA" "radio sickness" and "microwave sickness" occur at 30 uW/cm2, the U.S. limit is 1000 while the public maximum exposure limit in Russia is 1. "Radiation levels measured at the Moscow embassy were 1-15 uW/cm2." A cell phone held to the head is not far from 30, with bursts that exceed the limits. " It's like the bite of Dracula" ; tolerance to pulsed-microwaves is substantially reduced by the thousandths once inflicted with EHS.
In a 1994 report the "Air-Force" (which was held responsible for establishing modern U.S. safety standards) cited alterations in electrical activity of the cerebral cortex, and perturbations in higher functions of the central nervous system in animals at 5 uW/cm2 for 8 hours per day. Then state that a standard of 5000 uW/cm2 for six minutes is reasonable. In the conclusion they wrote that "evidence has shown that exposure to low-intensity radiation can have profound effects on biological processes".
Contradictions abound in this document. Why did they establish such a high intensity for short periods while military personnel are exposed to RADAR 24 hours per day? It's emphasized throughout the document that pulsed microwaves have a particularly potent biological effect. Wifi, cellular phones, RADAR and microwave warfare all employ pulsed microwaves. The ubiquitous switching-mode power supply pulses at radio frequencies. If the population is exposed to pulsed microwaves for ever longer periods why haven't the so called safety standards been changed?
Annals of recent studies reveal the bioeffects of low energy energy EMF at the cellular level. Proteins embedded in the cell membrane regulate electrical currents of ions into neurons. These channels are nature's carbon based transistors in which small signals regulate large currents. Conduction is changed as electromagnetic fields modify the size and shape of the proteins, particularly the multicharged lever on the Voltage Gated Calcium Channel (VGCC). Ionic Channels open if touched and when the transmembrane potential is altered. There are two types of silicone based transistors, bipolar and FET (field effect transistor). Bipolar transistors require a small current at the gate, which is amplified, thus a current amplifier. FETs require just voltage at the gate, which results in large currents. IGBTs are a hybrid, with an FET gate, and bipolar body. If there is an alternating electric field then there is a magnetic field and vica versa, one produces the other. An electromagnetic wave is a self-propagating oscillation of energy between electric and magnetic fields. That's why SAR ratings lack credibility, because only the near electric field is measured, without providing the wave impedance. If the impedance of the wave is low (derived more from a current source than voltage) then the magnetic field will be much larger than the electric field. Only after a few wavelenghths do the fields equalize in energy, and beak out into a wave. SAM is a rediculous prop, with salt water in his head. SAR is the throughput of energy per volume per time, where volume is mass divided by density. There's nothing specific about it. Nor is SAR a measurement of energy absorbed by brain tissue or body, it's the throughput of energy, derived from the average electric field. From a biomolecular view, peak electric and magnetic fields, frequency and modulation are of the essense. Thermal vs. non-thermal is a fictitious nomenclature. Any EMF, no matter how low in energy will set in motion (heat) biopolar water molecules, especially in the mocrowave range. The same holds true for non-ionizing vs. ionizing. There is no border, rather a continuous spectrum. Classic physics theorizes that a free electron set in motion by a sinusoidal electric field will not increase in kinetic energy with increased frequency. Though the accelleration of energy is proportional to frequency, something considered in the principals of electrical engineering. Acelleration of energy causes vibration in induction motors. In modern physics photon (particles of EMF) energy is directly proportional to frequency, E = hf, and quantized. All qualitative properties of the EMF emitted by wireless devices are disregarded by current standards, including SAR, boiled down to root mean square (RMS), the DC (direct current) eqivalent of extremely complex signals. This parochial approach of ignoring that the fields (energy) change in magnitude and direction is where the discrepancy between classic and modern physics lies, and a folly by those who establish standards. Enhanced nitrous oxide (NO) signaling may be therapeutic, but damage occurs from the production of radical reactive oxygenated species (ROS) including superoxide ions (O2-) and peroxynitrite (OONO-) which can destroy DNA within nanoseconds if not neutralized. Intracellular calcium (Ca++) ions catylize nitrous oxide synthase (NOS) to produce NO and the killing radicals. ROS are called killers because they are our immune system's first defence against invaders. Every move, thought, heartbeat, secretion and gene expression are signaled by waves of intracellular Ca++. Thus the manifold symptoms of EHS, and the link between toxins and EHS; VGCCs are compromised by toxins. Mitochindrial DNA is highly susceptible to mutations, and ATP production is corrolated with intracellular calcium, resulting in chronic fatigue. To prolong the waves of cystolic Ca++ the sarcoplasmic reticulum (ER) and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) release their stores of Ca++ in what is called CA++-induced CA++ release (CICR). The smoking gun is the observation of a flood of calcium ions after short exposures to electromagnetic fields, including those that are static. "Many, perhaps all non-thermal health effects are produced by activation of voltage gated calcium channels in plasma membranes."
The exact mechanisms need not have to be understood before recognizing the harm, as the corrolation between EMF and biological damage is self-evident. Man will never fully understand the why's or how's of life, yet life's existence is not to be denied.
Biological damage includes:
- oxidative stress
- cellular DNA mutations
- cancer
- breakdown of the blood brain barrier
- infertility
- depression
- melatonin depletion
- sudden death
Once a person becomes sensitized to electromagnetism - whether triggered from chemicals, heavy metals, electromagnetism, or their combination - the symptoms are manifested by very weak electromagnetic fields (EMF), in fact, significantly weaker than most would fathom possible. Many are sensitive to fields less than a millionth of the FCC limits depending on the frequency and modulation. Therein lies ammunition for the skeptics, whose only convenient explanation is relegated to a psychosomatic or delusional phenomenon.
Symptoms vary widely among individuals, and in some cases are debilitating. They include: skin irritation, rashes, tingling sensations, sleep disorder, chronic fatigue, nausea, dizziness, headaches, burning sensation in the head, chest pains, irregular heart rhythm, brain fog, compromised immune system, tinnitus, and others. These symptoms are unspecific, meaning they can be caused by various stimuli, thus making EHS all the more elusive.
Know your enemy! Avoid EMF/RF by measuring your environment with meters.
